Comparison between Direct and Indirect Heat Flux Measurement Techniques: Preliminary Laboratory Tests

Abstract

Direct and indirect approaches can be employed for estimating the heat flow through components in different application fields. In the building sector, the thermometric method is often applied by professionals for thermal transmittance evaluations. However, miscalculations can derive from inaccurate total heat transfer coefficients, and a consensus regarding the appropriate value to employ remains to be determined. Here, an apparatus was realized for laboratory tests and heat flux measurements were performed following direct and indirect approaches. Data acquired through a common heat flow sensor were compared with those computed through a post-processing based on radiative and convective estimations. The results were affected by the specific correlation adopted for computing the convective coefficients, with the percentage differences ranging from −9.8% to −0.4%. New measurement systems could be designed for automatically computing heat fluxes through indirect approaches, thus providing alternative solutions in the panorama of non-destructive tests for building energy diagnosis.