Are only-children different? Evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment of the Chinese one-child policy

7Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, we present evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment of the effects of the Chinese one-child policy on adults in China who were born just before and after the introduction of the policy. We measure risk, uncertainty, and time preferences, as well as subjects' preferences in the social domain, i.e., concerning competitiveness, cooperation, and bargaining. We sampled people from three Chinese provinces born both before and after the introduction of the policy in 1979. We utilize the fact that the one-child policy was introduced at different times and with different degrees of strictness in different provinces. Overall, we find a statistically significant effect only on risk and uncertainty aversion and not on any other preferences in the experiments: Those born after the introduction of the one-child policy are less risk and uncertainty averse. These results hold for various robustness checks and heterogeneity tests. Hence, our results do not confirm the general wisdom and stereotype of only-children in China being "little emperors."Copyright:

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carlsson, F., Lampi, E., Martinsson, P., Tu, Q., & Yang, X. (2022). Are only-children different? Evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment of the Chinese one-child policy. PLoS ONE, 17(11 November). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277210

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free