Piecewise Analytic Method VS Runge-Kutta Method (Comparative Study)

  • Abassy T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Even though Runge-Kutta (RK) method is the most used by scientists and engineers, it is not the most powerful method. In this paper, a comparative study between Piecewise Analytic Method (PAM) and RK methods is achieved. The result of comparative study shows that PAM is more powerful and gives results better than RK Methods. PAM can be considered as a new step in the evolution of solving nonlinear differential equations.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abassy, T. (2020). Piecewise Analytic Method VS Runge-Kutta Method (Comparative Study). International Journal of Applied Mathematical Research, 9(2), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijamr.v9i2.31118

Readers over time

‘19‘21‘22‘2300.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 1

50%

Materials Science 1

50%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0