Short-term intermittent PTH 1-34 administration enhances bone formation in SCID/Beige mice

9Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The anabolic effect of intermittent PTH on bone is variable depending on the species studied, duration/mode of administration, and location of skeletal response investigated. We tested the hypothesis that low dose, short term, intermittent PTH 1-34 administration is sufficient to enhance bone formation without altering bone resorption. To test our hypothesis, mice were treated intermittently with one of three concentrations of PTH 1-34 (1 μg/kg, low; 10 μg/kg or 20 μg/kg, high) for three weeks. The skeletal response was identified by quantifying: serum markers of bone turnover, cancellous bone parameters in distal femur, proximal tibia, and lumbar vertebrae by μCT, and number of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in distal femur. Mice receiving 20 μg/kg of PTH 1-34 demonstrated a 30% increase in serum osteocalcin, but no differences in serum calcium, type I collagen teleopeptides, or TRACP 5b. For all bones, μCT analysis suggested mice receiving 20 μg/kg of PTH 1-34 had increased cancellous bone mineral density, trabecular thickness and spacing, but decreased trabecular number. A 60% increase in the number of alkaline phosphatase positive osteoblasts in the distal femur was also observed in tissue sections; however, the number of TRAP positive osteoclasts was not different between test and control groups. While animals administered 10 μg/kg demonstrated similar trends for all bone turnover indices, such alterations were not observed in animals administered PTH 1-34 at 1 μg/kg per day. Thus, PTH 1-34, administered intermittently for three weeks at 20 μg/kg is sufficient to enhance bone formation without enhancing resorption.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sheehan, S., Muthusamy, A., Paul, E., Sikes, R. A., & Gomes, R. R. (2010). Short-term intermittent PTH 1-34 administration enhances bone formation in SCID/Beige mice. Endocrine Journal, 57(5), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.K09E-349

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free