Role of 18-FDG/PET in evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma managed locally by transarterial chemoembolization compared to triphasic computed tomography

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: This study was done to evaluate the role of FDG/PET compared to CECT in evaluating HCC after local interventional treatment. We evaluate forty-six patients with known history of TACE as a locoregional treatment of pathologically proved HCC. There were forty-three males and three females. Results: The collected data were statistically analyzed, and we found that FDG-PET has a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 84%, positive predictive value of 86.7%, negative predictive value of 86.4%, and accuracy of 93.4% in the detection of residual or recurrent at the managed tumor bed compared to CECT which shows a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 84%, positive predictive value of 86.7%, negative predictive value of 86.4%, and accuracy of 93.4 %). Combined views (FDG-PET/CT) are better in evaluation. Conclusion: FDG-PET is better in the detection of residual or recurrence in HCC which is locally managed by TACE.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gomaa, M. I. (2020). Role of 18-FDG/PET in evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma managed locally by transarterial chemoembolization compared to triphasic computed tomography. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-020-00229-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free