Assessing demographic differences in patient-perceived improvement in facial appearance and quality of life following rhinoplasty

32Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: As rhinoplasty patient demographics evolve, surgeons must consider the impact of demographics on patient satisfaction. Objectives: The objective of this study was to identify independent demographic predictors of differences in satisfaction with appearance and quality of life following rhinoplasty utilizing the FACE-Q patient-reported outcome instrument. Methods: Patients presenting for rhinoplasty completed the following FACE-Q scales: Satisfaction with Facial Appearance, Satisfaction with Nose, Social Function, and Psychological Well-being. Higher FACE-Q scores indicate greater satisfaction with appearance or superior quality of life. Pre-and post-treatment scores were compared in the context of patient demographics. Results: The scales were completed by 59 patients. Women demonstrated statistically significant improvements in Satisfaction with Facial Appearance and quality of life while men only experienced significant improvement in Satisfaction with Facial appearance. Caucasians demonstrated statistically significant improvement in Satisfaction with Facial Appearance and quality of life while non-Caucasians did not. Patients younger than 35 years old were more likely to experience enhanced Satisfaction with Facial Appearance and quality of life compared with patients older than 35 years old. Patients with income ≥$100,000 were more likely to experience significant increases in Satisfaction with Facial Appearance and quality of life than patients with incomes

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schwitzer, J. A., Albino, F. P., Mathis, R. K., Scott, A. M., Gamble, L., & Baker, S. B. (2015). Assessing demographic differences in patient-perceived improvement in facial appearance and quality of life following rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 35(7), 784–793. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjv066

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free