Acquired and inherited thrombophilic factors and the risk for residual venous thrombosis

9Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Acquired and inherited thrombophilic factors increase the risk for (recurrent) venous thrombotic disease. However, little is known about the pathophysiological mechanisms causing these recurrences, or the persistence of thrombosis despite adequate treatment. Because residual thrombosis has been associated with a worse prognostic outcome, we performed an explorative study in order to investigate the prevalence of residual thrombotic lesions after anticoagulant treatment in patients with deep venous thrombosis. Thrombotic parameters as assessed by ultrasonography after a 12-week course of anticoagulants were used. Both thrombophilia in general and acquired thrombophilia in particular were found to be associated with the extent of residual thrombosis. Of the individual thrombophilic factors, protein C deficiency, prothrombin 20210A mutation, active malignant disease and lupus anticoagulant were associated with an increased risk of residual thrombotic mass. Patients with inherited thrombophilia did not differ from patients without any thrombophilic abnormality with regard to residual thrombotic mass [relative risk (RR) 1.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9-1.8], while acquired throm bophilic disorders increased the risk for residual thrombotic mass as compared to patients without any defect (RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.2). Although these results should be confirmed in a larger study, they might help us form hypotheses concerning why patients with thrombophilia are more prone to recurrent venous thromboembolic disease. Copyright © 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bank, I., Tick, L. W., Hutten, B. A., Kramer, M. H. H., Middeldorp, S., & Büller, H. R. (2003). Acquired and inherited thrombophilic factors and the risk for residual venous thrombosis. Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis, 33(4), 192–196. https://doi.org/10.1159/000081507

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free