Dynamics of bank capital ratios and risk-taking: Evidence from US commercial banks

22Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study aims to explore how different capital ratios influence the risk-taking of large commercial banks of the USA. The study collects the data from FDIC for commercial banks from 2003 to 2019. We use a two-step GMM method to manage the endogeneity, simultaneity, heteroscedasticity, and auto-correlations issue. The findings conclude that an increase in the risk-based capital ratios decreases the banks’ risks. Empirical findings demonstrated a significant and positive association between non-risk-based capital ratios and bank risk-taking. The findings also demonstrate that an increase in capital buffer ratios decreases the banks’ risks. The impact of capital ratios on risk-taking is heterogeneous for well and under-capitalized banks. The findings suggest that State-chartered member and non-member banks are inclined to take a higher risk than nationally chartered banks. The findings have implications for regulators to consider the State-chartered member, non-member, and nationally chartered banks while formulating the new guidelines for required capital ratios.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abbas, F., & Ali, S. (2020). Dynamics of bank capital ratios and risk-taking: Evidence from US commercial banks. Cogent Economics and Finance, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1838693

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free