“Ordering the Wild”: How Adaptive Management Is Used to Maintain Nature Like a Postcard

9Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this paper we examine and critique adaptive management (AM) practices for protected areas (PAs), in pursuit of practices that can account for more-than-human relations. Engaging with empirical research from Australian PAs, we reflect on the formation of PAs as “exceptional places” where Nature is implicitly/explicitly to be controlled. We find that AM practices harness the spatial and temporal characteristics of the PAs to deliberatively construct a static and timeless scene, creating a particular vision of Nature. This metaphoric vision is captured “like a postcard.” It reinforces and justifies static protectionism as Nature conservation, arraigning a series of material objects that are meant to assist with maintaining that image: that “reality.” Using sentipensar as an exemplar, we explore and highlight relational and everchanging human-nonhuman engagements to contest the ontological dimensions of a static Nature and ideas of control and power associated with the binaries of Nature and culture.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gelves-Gomez, F., Carter, J., Beilin, R., & Brincat, S. (2024). “Ordering the Wild”: How Adaptive Management Is Used to Maintain Nature Like a Postcard. Society and Natural Resources, 37(5), 791–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2172241

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free