Abstract
In this paper we examine and critique adaptive management (AM) practices for protected areas (PAs), in pursuit of practices that can account for more-than-human relations. Engaging with empirical research from Australian PAs, we reflect on the formation of PAs as “exceptional places” where Nature is implicitly/explicitly to be controlled. We find that AM practices harness the spatial and temporal characteristics of the PAs to deliberatively construct a static and timeless scene, creating a particular vision of Nature. This metaphoric vision is captured “like a postcard.” It reinforces and justifies static protectionism as Nature conservation, arraigning a series of material objects that are meant to assist with maintaining that image: that “reality.” Using sentipensar as an exemplar, we explore and highlight relational and everchanging human-nonhuman engagements to contest the ontological dimensions of a static Nature and ideas of control and power associated with the binaries of Nature and culture.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Gelves-Gomez, F., Carter, J., Beilin, R., & Brincat, S. (2024). “Ordering the Wild”: How Adaptive Management Is Used to Maintain Nature Like a Postcard. Society and Natural Resources, 37(5), 791–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2172241
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.