Computational assessment of feature combinations for pathogenic variant prediction

12Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background Although several methods have been proposed for predicting the effects of genetic variants and their role in disease, it is still a challenge to identify and prioritize pathogenic variants within sequencing studies. Methods Here, we compare different variant and gene-specific features as well as existing methods and investigate their best combination to explore potential performance gains. Results We found that combining the number of “biological process” Gene Ontology annotations of a gene with the methods PON-P2, and PROVEAN significantly improves prediction of pathogenic variants, outperforming all individual methods. A comprehensive analysis of the Gene Ontology feature suggests that it is not a variant-dependent annotation bias but reflects the multifunctional nature of disease genes. Furthermore, we identified a set of difficult variants where different prediction methods fail. Conclusion Existing pathogenicity prediction methods can be further improved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

König, E., Rainer, J., & Domingues, F. S. (2016). Computational assessment of feature combinations for pathogenic variant prediction. Molecular Genetics and Genomic Medicine, 4(4), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.214

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free