Pro-Con Debate: Perioperative Research Should Be Color-Blind

3Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Profound racial and ethnic disparities have been documented in health and health care outcomes in recent decades. Some researchers have erroneously ascribed these inequities to biological variations, prompting debate as to how, or even if, race and ethnicity should be included as an outcome variable. Color blindness is a racial ideology with roots in constitutional law that posits that equality is best achieved by disregarding the racial and ethnic characteristics of the individual. Color consciousness, in contrast, approaches disparities with the knowledge that experiences related to one's race and ethnicity influence an individual's health and well-being. In this Pro-Con commentary article, we discuss the concept of color blindness and debate its use as an approach in medicine and research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Willer, B. L., Alalade, E., Toledo, P., & Jimenez, N. (2023). Pro-Con Debate: Perioperative Research Should Be Color-Blind. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 137(5), 967–972. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000006258

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free