Trauma survival margin analysis: A dissection of trauma center performance through initial lactate

3Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Measurement of trauma center performance presently relies on W-score calculation and comparison to national data sets. A limitation to this practice is a skewing of theWscore, as it determines overall performance of a trauma population that is often heavily weighted by patients of low acuity. The University of Virginia relative mortality metric (RMM) was formulated to provide higher resolution in identifying areas of performance improvement within subpopulations of a trauma center using traditional Trauma Injury Severity Score methodology. Lactic acidosis has been established as a risk factor for mortality in the setting of trauma. This study aims to compare survival margin, defined as the area between actual and predicted mortality curves, in patients with either normal or elevated initial lactate. Wscore and RMM were calculated and compared in these cohorts. Whereas the W score suggested increased survival within the high initial lactate group, the RMM demonstrated the expected finding of increased survival margin in the normal lactate cohort. The RMM is a potentially valuable tool for trauma centers to monitor and improve performance. In addition, these findings validate the use of lactate as a triage and risk adjustment tool in the trauma setting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kassar, O. M., Eklund, E. A., Barnhardt, W. F., Napoli, N. J., Barnes, L. E., & Young, J. S. (2016). Trauma survival margin analysis: A dissection of trauma center performance through initial lactate. In American Surgeon (Vol. 82, pp. 649–653). Southeastern Surgical Congress. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481608200733

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free