Correlations of survival with progression-free survival, response rate, and disease control rate in advanced biliary tract cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised trials of first-line chemotherapy

19Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background:The need to promote novel drug development for advanced biliary tract cancer (ABTC) has emphasised the importance of determining whether various efficacy end points can act as surrogates for overall survival (OS).Methods:We conducted a literature search of randomised trials of first-line chemotherapy for ABTC and investigated correlations between efficacy end points and OS using weighted linear regression analysis. The ratios of the median OS, median progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, and disease control rate in each trial were used to summarise treatment effects. The surrogate threshold effect (STE), which was the minimum treatment effect on PFS required to predict a non-zero treatment effect on OS, was calculated.Results:Seventeen randomised trials with 36 treatment arms were identified, and a sample size of 2148 patients with 19 paired arms was analysed. The strongest correlation between all evaluated efficacy end points was observed between median OS and median PFS ratios (r 2 =0.66). In trials with gemcitabine-containing therapies and targeted agents, the r 2 -values were 0.78. The STE was estimated at 0.83 for all trials and 0.81 for trials with gemcitabine-containing therapies, and was not calculated for trials with targeted agents.Conclusions:The median PFS ratio correlated well with the median OS ratio, and may be useful for planning a clinical trial for novel drug development.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moriwaki, T., Yamamoto, Y., Gosho, M., Kobayashi, M., Sugaya, A., Yamada, T., … Hyodo, I. (2016). Correlations of survival with progression-free survival, response rate, and disease control rate in advanced biliary tract cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised trials of first-line chemotherapy. British Journal of Cancer, 114(8), 881–888. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.83

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free