Findings vs. Interpretation in “The Long-Term Impacts of Teachers” by Chetty et al.

  • Adler M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The authors of the study “The Long-Term Impact of Teachers” claim that their study shows that increases in teacher value-added lead to significant and lasting increases in test scores and significant increases in income that will last throughout adulthood. Instead, I show that these claims are false because they are contradicted by the findings of the study itself. In fact, the results of the Chetty et al. study raise serious questions about the benefits of using the value-added method for evaluating teachers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adler, M. (2013). Findings vs. Interpretation in “The Long-Term Impacts of Teachers” by Chetty et al. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21, 10. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v21n10.2013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free