Abstract
ObjectiveTo compare an educational group intervention with individual care to improve clinical and management variables among patients with cardiovascular risk (CVR) in community health care (PC).MethodsA randomised controlled experimental study was developed in 7 PC centres of Barcelona (Spain). A total of 2,127 patients included in the chronic diseases protocol of the centres were selected. The intervention group (IG) attended four educative workshops led by their nurses during one year. Clinical and management variables (number of visits, pharmaceutical expenditure, nurse time consumption) were measured at baseline and 3 months after the intervention in the IG and in the control group (CG). Pre-post-intervention and IG vs. CG differences were analysed.ResultsAmong the 672 patients belonging to the IG, 144 were lost due to failing to attend the workshops. CG (n=824) had no withdrawals. At the end of follow-up there were no significant differences between their clinical variables. The number of visits and pharmaceutical expenditure increased in the IG. However, the annual dedication of nurses per patient per year was 39.59minutes in the IG and 60minutes in the CG.ConclusionsNurse group control of patients with CVR in PC saves nurse-time compared with the usual individual visits. However, further studies are needed to better define what type of patient that is more susceptible to follow cardiovascular control through group workshops and whether this time-saving is related to the use of other health resources.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Rodríguez Martín, C., Castaño Sánchez, C., García Ortiz, L., Recio Rodríguez, J. I., Castaño Sánchez, Y., & Gómez Marcos, M. Á. (2009). Eficacia de una intervención educativa grupal sobre cambios en los estilos de vida en hipertensos en atención primaria: un ensayo clínico aleatorio. Revista Española de Salud Pública, 83(3), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1135-57272009000300009
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.