In the Flesh? Anthropodermic Bibliopegy Verification and Its Implications

  • Gordon J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Special collections hold a host of objects that lie outside the anticipated disintegrating newsprint or leather-bound tomes. Sometimes the items, at least as far as their provenance informs, appear to be rather abnormal. Within the Cassel Collection, held at Beeghly Library at Juniata College, was one such volume: Bibliotheca Politica. Abraham H. Cassel (1820–1908) collected widely during his lifetime, amassing a collection of 50,000 volumes. On the front flyleaf of Bibliotheca Politica, Cassel wrote: “This book [is] bound in human skin.” As will be seen, this is not a unique notation, nor is it unusual for such an inscription to be the only bit of information to suggest the binding material. Subsequent peptide mass fingerprinting of samples taken from the binding of Bibliotheca Politica proved it to be made of sheepskin. While this result led to a mingled sense of disappointment and relief, it did spark the author’s curiosity into this historical binding practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gordon, J. (2017). In the Flesh? Anthropodermic Bibliopegy Verification and Its Implications. RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts, and Cultural Heritage, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.5860/rbm.17.2.9664

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free