Machine learning in anesthesiology: Detecting adverse events in clinical practice

13Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The credibility of threshold-based alarms in anesthesia monitors is low and most of the warnings they produce are not informative. This study aims to show that Machine Learning techniques have a potential to generate meaningful alarms during general anesthesia without putting constraints on the type of procedure. Two distinct approaches were tested – Complication Detection and Anomaly Detection. The former is a generic supervised learning problem and for this a simple feed-forward Neural Network performed best. For the latter, we used an Encoder-Decoder Long Short-Term Memory architecture that does not require a large manually-labeled dataset. We show this approach to be more flexible and in the spirit of Explainable Artificial Intelligence, offering greater potential for future improvement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maciąg, T. T., van Amsterdam, K., Ballast, A., Cnossen, F., & Struys, M. M. R. F. (2022). Machine learning in anesthesiology: Detecting adverse events in clinical practice. Health Informatics Journal, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582221112855

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free