Hybrid Vision Transformer–CNN Framework for Alzheimer’s Disease Cell Type Classification: A Comparative Study with Vision–Language Models

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Accurate identification of Alzheimer’s disease (AD)-related cellular characteristics from microscopy images is essential for understanding neurodegenerative mechanisms at the cellular level. While most computational approaches focus on macroscopic neuroimaging modalities, cell type classification from microscopy remains relatively underexplored. In this study, we propose a hybrid vision transformer–convolutional neural network (ViT–CNN) framework that integrates DeiT-Small and EfficientNet-B7 to classify three AD-related cell types—astrocytes, cortical neurons, and SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells—from phase-contrast microscopy images. We perform a comparative evaluation against conventional CNN architectures (DenseNet, ResNet, InceptionNet, and MobileNet) and prompt-based multimodal vision–language models (GPT-5, GPT-4o, and Gemini 2.5-Flash) using zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought prompting. Experiments conducted with stratified fivefold cross-validation show that the proposed hybrid model achieves a test accuracy of 61.03% and a macro F1 score of 61.85, outperforming standalone CNN baselines and prompt-only LLM approaches under data-limited conditions. These results suggest that combining convolutional inductive biases with transformer-based global context modeling can improve generalization for cellular microscopy classification. While constrained by dataset size and scope, this work serves as a proof of concept and highlights promising directions for future research in domain-specific pretraining, multimodal data integration, and explainable AI for AD-related cellular analysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hasan, M. E., Fuad, M. T. H., Sharif, O., & Wagler, A. (2026). Hybrid Vision Transformer–CNN Framework for Alzheimer’s Disease Cell Type Classification: A Comparative Study with Vision–Language Models. Journal of Imaging, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12030098

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free