A comparison of cemented paste backfill shotcrete barricade design methods

  • Veenstra R
  • Zhao X
  • Fourie A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The use of cemented paste backfill (CPB) is becoming increasingly more common at underground mines worldwide. Part of any CPB design includes the specification of the (typically) shotcrete barricades that retain the CPB within the stope during filling. Newmont's Tanami Operations (NTO) has started an in situ barricade stress monitoring program. The data from this program will provide a basis for comparison of several models that can be used to model the capacity of these barricades. These models vary in complexity from analytical solutions to 3D numerical models. Part of the comparison will include a discussion detailing the required material inputs and how these inputs were obtained. Analysis of this comparison will provide additional understanding on what parameters affect the ultimate capacity of a shotcrete barricade.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Veenstra, R., Zhao, X., Fourie, A., & Grobler, J. (2021). A comparison of cemented paste backfill shotcrete barricade design methods. In Paste 2021: 24th International Conference on Paste, Thickened and Filtered Tailings (pp. 409–424). Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth. https://doi.org/10.36487/acg_repo/2115_33

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free