Comparison of Thermal Performances between Low Porosity Perforate Plate and Flat Plate Solar Air Collector

7Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Flat plate solar air collector is the most common collector design, which is relatively simpler to fabricate and lower cost. In the present study, perforated plate solar collector was developed to improve the system thermal performance. A glazed perforated plate of 6mm holes diameter with square geometry was designed and installed as the absorber of the collector. The influences of solar radiation intensity and mass flow rate on the thermal performance were investigated. The perforated collector was compared with the flat plate solar collector under the same operating conditions. The highest values of thermal efficiency in this study for the perforated plate (PP) and the flat plate (FP) solar collectors were 59% and 36% respectively, at solar radiation intensity of 846 Wm-2 and mass flow rate of 0.02 kgs-1. Furthermore, PP collector gave better thermal performance compared to FP collector; and compared to previous studies, the present perforated design was compatible with the flat plate with double pass designs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chan, H. Y., Vinson, A. A., Baljit, S. S. S., & Ruslan, M. H. (2018). Comparison of Thermal Performances between Low Porosity Perforate Plate and Flat Plate Solar Air Collector. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 989). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/989/1/012001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free