Prone positioning as an emerging tool in the care provided to patients infected with COVID-19: A scoping review

17Citations
Citations of this article
194Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: to describe scientific evidence regarding the use of prone positioning in the care provided to patients with acute respiratory failure caused by COVID-19. Method: this is a scoping review. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews was used to support the writing of this study. The search was conducted in seven databases and resulted in 2,441 studies, 12 of which compose the sample. Descriptive statistics, such as relative and absolute frequencies, was used to analyze data. Results: prone positioning was mainly adopted in Intensive Care Units, lasted from a minimum of 12 up to 16 hours, and its prescription was based on specific criteria, such as PaO2 /FiO2 ratio, oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate. The most prevalent complications were: accidental extubation, pressure ulcer, and facial edema. Decreased hypoxemia and mortality rates were the main outcomes reported. Conclusion: positive outcomes outweighed complications. Various cycles of prone positioning are needed, which may cause potential work overload for the health staff. Therefore, an appropriate number of trained workers is necessary, in addition to specific institutional protocols to ensure patient safety in this context.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Araújo, M. S., Dos Santos, M. M. P., Silva, C. J. de A., de Menezes, R. M. P., Feijão, A. R., & de Medeiros, S. M. (2021). Prone positioning as an emerging tool in the care provided to patients infected with COVID-19: A scoping review. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. Escola de Enfermagem de Universidade de Sao Paulo. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.4732.3397

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free