Testing for Salmonella spp. in released parrots, wild parrots, and domestic fowl in Lowland Peru

7Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Wild animal populations face threats from pathogens from both intentionally released captive animals and domestic animals that accompany human settlements. From December 2004 through August 2005, we studied free living macaws and parrots in the Tambopata National Reserve in the Peruvian Amazon and semicaptive domestic fowl in human settlements adjacent to the reserve. In 1992-1993, large macaws (Aras spp.) that were serologically positive for Salmonella Pullorum were released into this reserve, which hosts dense populations of free-living parrots and macaws. We collected cloacal swabs from 64 birds and cultured for Salmonella spp. via standard laboratory methods. All 35 psittacines tested were culture negative for Salmonella spp., while 31% of 29 domestic fowl were culture positive. Our findings suggest that the domestic fowl that accompany human settlement in this region carry and shed Salmonella spp. that could threaten wild bird populations in and around the reserve. © Wildlife Disease Association 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Butro, O., & Brightsmith, D. J. (2010). Testing for Salmonella spp. in released parrots, wild parrots, and domestic fowl in Lowland Peru. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 46(3), 718–723. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-46.3.718

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free