A dual route in explaining health outcomes in natural disaster

27Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Human beings seem to be resilient and have a great capacity to overcome adverse circumstances. One apparent variable that may predict people's emotional and physical health after a trauma is their general level of psychological well-being (b32McMillen, Smith, & Fisher, 1997). The current study explores the role of subjective vitality and the perception of stress as mediators between general life satisfaction and post-trauma physiological and psychological health related to the Canadian 1998 Ice Storm. Results of this dual route indicate that satisfaction with life positively predicted subjective vitality and negatively predicted perceived stress. In turn, subjective vitality lead to lower levels of ill-health, whereas perception of stress lead to higher levels of physical symptoms and depression. © 2006 Blackwell Publishing, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tremblay, M. A., Blanchard, C. M., Pelletier, L. G., & Vallerand, R. J. (2006). A dual route in explaining health outcomes in natural disaster. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(6), 1502–1522. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00069.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free