Race-based differences in serum biomarkers for cancer-associated cachexia in a diverse cohort of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is projected to become the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths by 2040, with the highest disease burden expected amongst Non-Hispanic Black patients. One of the most significant predictors of poor outcomes is the presence of cancer-associated cachexia (CCa). Yet, race- and ethnicity-specific biomarkers for early CCa diagnosis are lacking. Methods: We evaluated a panel of candidate biomarkers of CCa in a diverse cohort of patients with pre-treatment serum using multiplex ELISA-based methods. Results: We find that growth/differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) is associated with cachexia severity, is superior to standard biomarkers at classifying cachexia, and differentiates between non-cachexia and pre-cachexia status, but only among Hispanic/Latinx and non-Hispanic White participants. Furthermore, high GDF-15 levels at diagnosis are associated with a greater weight loss from 3.3% (95%CI = −0.14–6.7) to 8.0% (CI = 5.9–10.1) over the 6 months post-diagnosis. Finally, both ENA-78/CXCL5 and GRO-α/CXCL1 are elevated in non-Hispanic Black individuals in a disease-independent manner (P < 0.001 for both analytes). Conclusions: GDF-15 may be a potential biomarker for “pre-cachexia” in the non-Hispanic White and the Hispanic population, but not non-Hispanic Black individuals. These findings underscore the unmet need to enroll non-Hispanic Black participants in clinical trials for CCa.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, M. A., Davis, E. W., Alhassan, S., Arnoletti, J. P., Basinski, T. L., McKee, A. B., … Permuth, J. B. (2026). Race-based differences in serum biomarkers for cancer-associated cachexia in a diverse cohort of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Communications Medicine, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-01277-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free