Comparison of approaches for estimating the probability of coastal flooding

57Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Coastal flooding is typically caused by combinations of extreme water-levels and large waves. Two extreme value methods, one univariate and the other multivariate, have been used for estimating the probability of coastal flooding at an existing flood defence structure and for aiding the design of a new structure. The properties of these two methods are compared in terms of extrapolation, sophistication and use of information for a range of extremal dependence structures. We find that, when applied to the assessment of the safety offered by an existing Dutch dike, the multivariate approach provides the more useful and accurate design information and has the substantial benefits of consistency and reduced statistical analysis when applied to several sites along a Dutch coastline.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bruun, J. T., & Tawn, J. A. (1998). Comparison of approaches for estimating the probability of coastal flooding. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C: Applied Statistics, 47(3), 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9876.00118

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free