Resistance to medical artificial intelligence is an attribute in a compensatory decision process: Response to pezzo and beckstead (2020)

23Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In Longoni et al. (2019), we examine how algorithm aversion influences utilization of healthcare delivered by human and artificial intelligence providers. Pezzo and Beckstead’s (2020) commentary asks whether resistance to medical AI takes the form of a noncompensatory decision strategy, in which a single attribute determines provider choice, or whether resistance to medical AI is one of several attributes considered in a compensatory decision strategy. We clarify that our paper both claims and finds that, all else equal, resistance to medical AI is one of several attributes (e.g., cost and performance) influencing healthcare utilization decisions. In other words, resistance to medical AI is a consequential input to compensatory decisions regarding healthcare utilization and provider choice decisions, not a noncompensatory decision strategy. People do not always reject healthcare provided by AI, and our article makes no claim that they do.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Longoni, C., Bonezzi, A., & Morewedge, C. K. (2020). Resistance to medical artificial intelligence is an attribute in a compensatory decision process: Response to pezzo and beckstead (2020). Judgment and Decision Making, 15(3), 446–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500007233

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free