Inmunoglobulinas en sepsis y shock séptico

  • Salinas L. J
  • Fica C. A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Clinical efficacy of polyspecific immunoglobulins or monoclonal antibodies to treat patients with severe sepsis or septic shock is still under debate after several clinical trials. Only a few of them have been able to demonstrate a direct benefit to reduce mortality or this effect appears after meta-analysis. Evidence sustains that polyspecific immunoglobulin G reduces mortality in these patients, being this effect higher for IgM-enriched immunoglobulins. Best indications are postsurgical sepsis or early septic shock patients with high titers of endotoxinemia. The use of intravenous immunoglobulins is also recommended for the treatment of patients with streptococcal toxic shock, as demonstrated by the evidence obtained through case-control studies and one randomized clinical trial with a clear trend toward benefit.Evidence does not sustain a favorable impact on mortality for monoclonal antibodies directed against bacterial lypopolysaccaride, other bacterial antigens or against TNF-alpha. Furthermore, infusion of recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist or soluble receptors for TNF-alpha that could attenuate the inflammatory response have not demonstrated utility after many clinical trials. These therapeutic tools are characterized by a high acquisition cost and adequate cost-effectiveness analysis has not been yet performed

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Salinas L., J., & Fica C., A. (2005). Inmunoglobulinas en sepsis y shock séptico. Revista Chilena de Infectología, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.4067/s0716-10182005000100003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free