Can simple clinical measurements detect patient noncompliance?

431Citations
Citations of this article
261Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Measurement of patient compliance is essential if management of low compliance is to be performed efficiently. We assessed the ralue of several easily obtained clinical assessments compared to quantitative pill counts among 134 newly treated hypertensive male steelworkers during the first 6 months of their treatment with antihypertensJve medication. Patient's self-reports obtained on structured interview correlated best with pill count compliance (r = 0.74, p < 0.0001). Patients overestimated their compliance by an average of 17% but 90% of those who admitted to being noncompliant were found so. Qualitative urinary chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide levels and changes in serum potassium, uric acid, and blood pressure also correlated with pill count compliance but were less accurate than interviews. Assessment of the patient's "health beliefs" and a variety of sociodemographic and health traits and perceptions did not provide useful information on compliance. Interviewing the patient is a simple and useful approach in assessing compliance with antihypertensive therapy. © 1980 American Heart Association, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brian Haynes, R., Wayne Taylor, D., Sackett, D. L., Gibson, E. S., Bernholz, C. D., & Mukherjee, J. (1980). Can simple clinical measurements detect patient noncompliance? Hypertension, 2(6), 757–764. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.2.6.757

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free