The fine-tuning argument and the requirement of total evidence

18Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

According to the Fine-Tuning Argument (FTA), the existence of life in our universe confirms the Multiverse Hypothesis (HM). A standard objection to FTA is that it violates the Requirement of Total Evidence (RTE). I argue that RTE should be rejected in favor of the Predesignation Requirement, according to which, in assessing the outcome of a probabilistic process, we should only use evidence characterizable in a manner available before observing the outcome. This produces the right verdicts in some simple cases in which RTE leads us astray, and, when applied to FTA, it shows that our evidence does confirm HM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Epstein, P. F. (2017). The fine-tuning argument and the requirement of total evidence. Philosophy of Science, 84(4), 639–658. https://doi.org/10.1086/693465

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free