Combined superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery anastomosis and encephalo-duro-arterio-galeo-synangiosis (EDAGS) were retrospectively compared with indirect bypass, EDAGS with or without inversion, in 134 hemispheres of 96 adult patients with non-hemorrhagic moyamoya disease (MMD) in terms of angiographic findings, perioperative complications, and clinical outcome. Angio-graphic revascularization seemed to be better in the combined bypass group compared with the EDAGS group (p = 0.045), but perioperative complication tended to be slightly more common in the combined bypass group. No statistical differences were found in clinical outcome. EDAGS is a very reliable alternative to combined bypass in adult MMD. However, randomized clinical trials are needed to assess the long-term efficacy of any bypass surgery in adult patients with MMD.
CITATION STYLE
Kim, D. S., Huh, P. W., Kim, H. S., Kim, I. S., Choi, S., Mok, J. H., & Huh, C. W. (2012). Surgical treatment of moyamoya disease in adults: Combined direct and indirect vs. indirect bypass surgery. Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, 52(5), 333–338. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.52.333
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.