Surgical treatment of moyamoya disease in adults: Combined direct and indirect vs. indirect bypass surgery

52Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Combined superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery anastomosis and encephalo-duro-arterio-galeo-synangiosis (EDAGS) were retrospectively compared with indirect bypass, EDAGS with or without inversion, in 134 hemispheres of 96 adult patients with non-hemorrhagic moyamoya disease (MMD) in terms of angiographic findings, perioperative complications, and clinical outcome. Angio-graphic revascularization seemed to be better in the combined bypass group compared with the EDAGS group (p = 0.045), but perioperative complication tended to be slightly more common in the combined bypass group. No statistical differences were found in clinical outcome. EDAGS is a very reliable alternative to combined bypass in adult MMD. However, randomized clinical trials are needed to assess the long-term efficacy of any bypass surgery in adult patients with MMD.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, D. S., Huh, P. W., Kim, H. S., Kim, I. S., Choi, S., Mok, J. H., & Huh, C. W. (2012). Surgical treatment of moyamoya disease in adults: Combined direct and indirect vs. indirect bypass surgery. Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, 52(5), 333–338. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.52.333

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free