Commentary: Composite cognitive and functional measures for early stage Alzheimer's disease trials

6Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this commentary I consider the issues raised in Schneider and Goldberg's review of composite cognitive and functional measures. I find much to agree with in their commentary and especially their concerns regarding satisfactory psychometric validation of composite measures. I endorse also their provision for analysis by cognitive domain, backed by the use of statistical methods for grouping test variables. The authors helpfully mention the possibility that treatment effects may be peculiar to specific domains of cognitive function. I develop this view and argue for exploratory studies of new therapeutic interventions to include broad assessments of the cognitive domains known to be compromised in early Alzheimer's disease. I suggest that the results of exploratory studies be used to help identify target domains for confirmatory studies. Finally, I note that computerized cognitive composite assessments have often been validated in the fashion that the authors recommend for composite measures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harrison, J. E. (2020). Commentary: Composite cognitive and functional measures for early stage Alzheimer’s disease trials. Alzheimer’s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free