Skip to main content

Working consumers’ psychological states in firm-hosted virtual communities

2Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: Consumers’ self-interests and personal goals in attaining collective goals are rarely considered in firm-hosted virtual communities (FHVCs). Based on working consumers paradigm and agency theory, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the joint impact of consumers’ psychological states of empowerment, engagement and entitlement on value cocreation behaviors in FHVCs. Design/methodology/approach: US consumer panel data were used to test the proposed model on customers (n=338) participating in a FHVC. Findings: The results show significant effects of the psychological states of empowerment, engagement and entitlement on value cocreation. Of these three states, psychological empowerment had the strongest effect. The predictive strength of entitlement for value cocreation is weaker for individuals with high knowledge of the community (KC). Practitioner interviews conducted with FHVC managers establish the states and set forth an emerging research agenda. Research limitations/implications: This study extends the cocreation literature to establish the holistic importance of psychological states as key antecedents of value cocreation for working consumers. It acknowledges agency motives and establishes KC as a moderating condition. Practical implications: The explication of consumers’ psychological states has implications for the benchmarking and design of consumer portfolios. Originality/value: This study advances the literature on cocreation by collectively examining three psychological states of consumers through the lens of working consumers paradigm and agency theory. It also establishes KC as an important boundary resource condition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leo, W. W. C., Chou, C. Y., & Chen, T. (2019). Working consumers’ psychological states in firm-hosted virtual communities. Journal of Service Management, 30(3), 302–325. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-03-2018-0077

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free