Solar Occultation FTIR Spectrometry at Mars for Trace Gas Detection: A Sensitivity Study

4Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A sensitivity study has been performed to estimate detection limits of various atmospheric trace gases achievable by a Mars-orbiting solar occultation Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer. This was accomplished by first computing realistic limb transmittance spectra based on a model (T, P, VMR, and dust profiles) of the Mars atmosphere and adding appropriate noise and systematic errors based on assumed instrument design/configuration/performance. We then performed spectral fits to the resulting synthetic spectra to derive slant column abundances and their uncertainties. A profile retrieval was performed to infer limits of detection. This methodology was applied to a Mars-orbiting FTIR solar occultation spectrometer covering the 850–4,300 cm−1 spectral region at 0.025-cm−1 resolution. We conclude that most gases can be retrieved with a single-occultation sensitivity of 20–100 ppt. But this sensitivity varies considerably with the dust loading, especially for gases whose strongest absorption bands are toward higher wavenumbers where scattering is large. We conclude that for CH4, the ν4 band centered at 1,305 cm−1, despite being more than 2 times weaker than the ν3 band centered at 3,015 cm−1, offers better sensitivity due to its close spectral proximity to the dust extinction minimum. We also conclude that for the purpose of CH4 detection, a high-resolution (0.025 cm−1) broadband instrument would have a substantial advantage over a medium-resolution (0.15 cm−1) instrument, despite the latter having a much larger signal-to-noise ratio.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Toon, G. C., Liebe, C. C., Nemati, B., Harris, I., Kleinböhl, A., Allen, M., … Wennberg, P. O. (2019). Solar Occultation FTIR Spectrometry at Mars for Trace Gas Detection: A Sensitivity Study. Earth and Space Science, 6(5), 836–860. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EA000469

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free