Abstract
Conventional distance sampling adopts a mixed approach, using model-based methods for the detection process, and design-based methods to estimate animal abundance in the study region, given estimated probabilities of detection. In recent years, there has been increasing interest in fully model-based methods. Model-based methods are less robust for estimating animal abundance than conventional methods, but offer several advantages: they allow the analyst to explore how animal density varies by habitat or topography; abundance can be estimated for any sub-region of interest; they provide tools for analysing data from designed distance sampling experiments, to assess treatment effects. We develop a common framework for model-based distance sampling, and show how the various model-based methods that have been proposed fit within this framework.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Buckland, S. T., Oedekoven, C. S., & Borchers, D. L. (2016). Model-Based Distance Sampling. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 21(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-015-0220-7
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.