Emotion regulation and emotion work: Two sides of the same coin?

47Citations
Citations of this article
144Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This contribution links psychological models of emotion regulation to sociological accounts of emotion work to demonstrate the extent to which emotion regulation is systematically shaped by culture and society. I first discuss a well-established two-factor process model of emotion regulation and argue that a substantial proportion of emotion regulatory goals are derived from emotion norms. In contrast to universal emotion values and hedonic preferences, emotion norms are highly specific to social situations and institutional contexts. This specificity is determined by social cognitive processes of categorization and guided by framing rules. Second, I argue that the possibilities for antecedent-focused regulation, in particular situation selection and modification, are not arbitrarily available to individuals. Instead, they depend on economic, cultural, and social resources. I suggest that the systematic and unequal distribution of these resources in society leads to discernible patterns of emotion and emotion regulation across groups of individuals. © 2012 von Scheve.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

von Scheve, C. (2012). Emotion regulation and emotion work: Two sides of the same coin? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(NOV). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00496

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free