Nature and role of observational studies in public health policy concerning the effects of dietary salt intake on blood pressure

1Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Does dietary sodium in excess of a specified daily consumption substantively elevate blood pressure in normotensive people? Does lowering the daily consumption of sodium reduce blood pressure in normotensive people? Sound observational and interventional studies can address these questions, but there are substantial differences in the ability of various research designs to provide clear, bias-free answers. I summarize established scientific principles for addressing issues of causation and the effects of interventions and compare observational and interventional designs. Observational studies are important in exploring the possible determinants of health problems but are subject to bias and cannot directly assess the effects of interventions. They are superseded by sound interventional studies, particularly randomized controlled trials, in answering the key questions concerning causes and benefits of intervention.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haynes, R. B. (1997). Nature and role of observational studies in public health policy concerning the effects of dietary salt intake on blood pressure. In American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (Vol. 65). American Society for Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/65.2.622S

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free