Safety and efficacy of electromagnetic-guided bedside placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes versus standard placement

4Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although enteral feeding in critically ill patients has been shown to be beneficial, reliable postpyloric placement of feeding tubes remains a challenge. The standard of care involves blind placement, frequently requiring multiple attempts, and radiographs. To evaluate the effect of electromagnetic-guided bedside placement in reducing time to establishment of feeding, lung placement, use of radiography, and cost, we initiated a prospective trial using electromagneticguided bedside placement and compared them to a retrospective cohort. Fifty-Three consecutive placements of nasoenteral feeding tubes were made using electromagnetic-guidance on patients requiring enteral nutrition in a surgical intensive care unit at a tertiary care center. Sixty-Three placement attempts in the preceding seven months served as controls. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex, weight, body mass index, hiatal or ventral hernias, or previous esophageal/gastric operations. The number of radiographs needed per patient, need for fluoroscopy, radiology charge per patient for the tube placement, and time from first attempt at placement to confirmation of postpyloric location were lower for the electromagneticguided group. Use of electromagnetic guidance allows reliable and cost-effective postpyloric enteral feeding tube placement compared with blind insertion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shadid, H., Keckeisen, M., & Zarrinpar, A. (2017). Safety and efficacy of electromagnetic-guided bedside placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes versus standard placement. In American Surgeon (Vol. 83, pp. 1184–1187). Southeastern Surgical Congress. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481708301035

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free