Abstract
Studies on oral error correction in second language acquisition have been tilted towards cognitive aspects ignoring the affective and practical dimensions. This study attempted to fill this gap by investigating the role of students’ proficiency levels in five English language teachers’ corrective behavior. Follow-up interviews were conducted with the observed teachers. The results showed that the teachers provided more corrections to less proficient learners though they preferred more correction for advanced learners and used mainly recast for both groups, avoiding explicit forms of correction. They were mainly concerned with the affective aspects of oral error correction and acted on their own value system and teaching experience. The findings carry important implications for teacher education programs and the studies in this regard.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Sepehrinia, S., Fallah, N., & Torfi, S. (2020). English language teachers’ oral corrective preferences and practices across proficiency groups. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 22(2), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v22n2.82369
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.