What does it mean to be relational? A framework for assessment and practice

37Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

The authors begin with a question regarding how to better draw upon relational thinking in making case assessments and treatment plans. They first address issues regarding the cultural construction of self and relationships, integrating women's psychology, family systems, and collectivist culture literatures within a discussion of power. Then they present a heuristic framework for how individuals orient themselves within relationships that includes two dimensions - focus and power - and evolves out of the social context. From these two dimensions, a typology of four basic relational orientations is presented; position directed, rule directed, independence directed, and relationship directed. Case examples from couple's therapy and suggestions for practice are provided. © FPI, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Silverstein, R., Bass, L. B., Tuttle, A., Knudson-Martin, C., & Huenergardt, D. (2006). What does it mean to be relational? A framework for assessment and practice. Family Process, 45(4), 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2006.00178.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free