Reaching conceptual stability by re-articulating empirical and theoretical work on affordances

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Theoretical developments on affordances have proliferated, resulting in a lack of conceptual stability and a potential compromise in scientific validity. However, affordances should not be discarded, given their centrality in post-cognitive theories and their widespread reuse across various research domains. Empirical research on affordances remains sparse, out of sync with theoretical advancements, and thus unable to contribute effectively to scientific progress due to its disarticulation with theoretical work. That is why re-articulating theoretical and empirical investigations on affordances is needed to pave a more fruitful path for the concept’s advancement. To accomplish this objective, emphasis must be placed on empirical research, leveraging recent theoretical propositions and devising corresponding empirical methodologies. The proposed requirements and framework represent a step in this endeavor.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Malo, R., & Prié, Y. (2024). Reaching conceptual stability by re-articulating empirical and theoretical work on affordances. Frontiers in Psychology. Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1283168

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free