Efficiency vs effectiveness: An analysis of tertiary education across Europe

17Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper deals with tertiary education efficiency and effectiveness across 24 European Union countries in four sub-periods between 2004 and 2015. The efficiency scores are computed using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). We try to raise awareness of the quality, and not of the quantity, of educational outputs and inputs by introducing quality-based correction of the DEA efficiency score, which we regard as effectiveness. Our results show that quality considerations affect the relative positions of countries regarding their efficiency scores. In other words, some less developed countries, which are efficient in the quantity-based model, fail to reach the defined efficiency border when considering some quality indicators of outputs. On the other hand, some inefficient developed countries increase their DEA-based ranking and achieve effectiveness (quality-based efficiency). The same is true for input quality considerations. Since tertiary education cannot be expected to provide the same quality of outcomes with different input qualities, efficiency improves (deteriorates) in the input-output quality-based model in many countries with low (high) quality student bases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nadoveza Jelić, O., & Gardijan Kedžo, M. (2018). Efficiency vs effectiveness: An analysis of tertiary education across Europe. Public Sector Economics, 42(4), 382–414. https://doi.org/10.3326/pse.42.4.2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free