A review of informed consent and how it has evolved to protect vulnerable participants in emergency care research

9Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A vulnerable participant in research lacks capacity to consent or may be exposed to coercion to participate. Capacity may be temporarily impaired due to loss of consciousness, hypoxia, pain and the consumption of alcohol or elicit substances. To advance emergency care, providing life-threatening measures in life-threatening circumstances, vulnerable patients are recruited into research studies. The urgent need for time-critical treatment conflicts with routine informed consent procedures. This article reviews ethical considerations and moral obligations to safeguard these participants and preserve their autonomy. A particular focus is given to research methodology to waive consent, and the role of ethics committees, research audits, research nurses and community engagement. Research on the acutely unwell patient who lacks capacity is possible with well-designed research trials that are led by investigators who are sufficiently trained, engage the community, gain ethical approval to waive consent and continuously audit practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nandra, R., Brockie, A. F., & Hussain, F. (2020). A review of informed consent and how it has evolved to protect vulnerable participants in emergency care research. EFORT Open Reviews, 5(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.180051

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free