Hospital outcomes and long-term survival after referral to a specialized weaning unit

27Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is a frequent challenge, and an increasing number of patients are transferred from intensive care units to long-termacute care hospitals or specialized weaning units. There are few published data for discharge home rates, use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV), or long-term survival. Methods. A case-note and database review was conducted of patients admitted to a UK national specialized weaning unit for weaning from IMV between 1992 and 2012. Patients were grouped into diagnostic categories according to the predominant cause of weaning failure. Weaning outcomes and long-term survival were assessed according to diagnostic group and mode of ventilation on discharge. Results. Four hundred and fifty-eight patients were transferred for weaning from IMV. Four hundred and seventeen (91%) survived to hospital discharge, of whom at least 343 (82%) were ultimately discharged to their own home. Three hundred and thirty (72%) weaned from IMV, of whom 142 weaned from all ventilation and 188 weaned to nocturnal NIV. Weaning success was highest for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chest wall disorders. Median survival from unit discharge was 25 months (interquartile range 5-74), with the longest survival seen for patients discharged with nocturnal NIV [37 (12-81) months]. Conclusions. These results confirm successful weaning outcomes for patients transferred to a specialized weaning and long-term ventilation service. In contrast to other service models, most patients achieved discharge to their own home.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davies, M. G., Quinnell, T. G., Oscroft, N. S., Clutterbuck, S. P., Shneerson, J. M., & Smith, I. E. (2017). Hospital outcomes and long-term survival after referral to a specialized weaning unit. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 118(4), 563–569. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex031

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free