One-year results following PASCAL-based or MitraClip-based mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair

27Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has been established as a suitable alternative to mitral valve surgery in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and high surgical risk. The PASCAL system represents a novel device, potentially augmenting the toolkit for TEER. The aim of this study was to assess and compare short and 1 year safety and efficacy of the PASCAL and MitraClip systems for TEER. Methods and results: Procedural, short, and 1 year outcomes of a 1:2 propensity-matched cohort including 41 PASCAL and 82 MitraClip cases were investigated. Matching was based on clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and functional characteristics. The primary endpoints assessed were procedural success [as defined by the Mitral Valve Academy Research Consortium (MVARC)], residual MR, functional class, and a composite endpoint comprising death, heart failure hospitalization, and mitral valve re-intervention. We found for the PASCAL and the matched MitraClip cohort no significant differences in MVARC defined technical (90.2% vs. 95.1%, P = 0.44), device (90.2% vs. 89.0%, P = 1.0), or procedural (87.8% vs. 80.5%, P = 0.45) success rates. Accordingly, the overall MR reduction and improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class were comparable (1 year follow-up: MR ≤ 2 95% vs. 93.6%, P = 1.0; NYHA ≤ 2 57.1% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.59). The composite outcome revealed no statistically significant difference between both devices (1 year follow-up: 31.7% vs. 37.8%, P = 0.55). Interestingly, we found at both short and 1 year follow-up a significantly higher rate of patients with none or trace MR in the PASCAL-treated cohort (short follow-up: 17.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.0081; 1 year follow-up: 25% vs. 0%, P = 0.0016). Conversely, the rate of aborted device implantations due to an elevated transmitral gradient was higher in PASCAL interventions (9.8% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.04). Conclusions: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair using the PASCAL or MitraClip device results in favourable and comparable outcomes regarding safety, efficacy, and clinical improvement after 1 year.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Geis, N. A., Schlegel, P., Heckmann, M. B., Katus, H. A., Frey, N., Crespo López, P., & Raake, P. W. J. (2022). One-year results following PASCAL-based or MitraClip-based mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. ESC Heart Failure, 9(2), 853–865. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13849

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free