Review reputational risk and sustainability: A bibliometric analysis of relevant literature

18Citations
Citations of this article
121Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis of reputational risk and sustainability. The research was conducted using the Scopus database, which returned 88 publications published during 2001–2020, revealing that the amount of research output within this field is limited, and more research output should be conducted in the field of reputational risk and sustainability. We identified nine research streams: reputation risk, reputation risk and sustainability, supply chain management, social responsibility, reputation risk management, strategic approach, sustainable development, corporate sustainability and risk assessment. This bibliometric analysis provides managerial and policy implications for sustainability consideration of reputational risk with perceptions to advance knowledge in this important research field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nobanee, H., Alhajjar, M., Abushairah, G., & Al Harbi, S. (2021, July 1). Review reputational risk and sustainability: A bibliometric analysis of relevant literature. Risks. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9070134

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free