Virtual world café method for identifying mental health research priorities: Methodological case study

22Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

People with lived experience of mental health problems as both consumers and carers can bring significant expertise to the research process. However, the methods used to gather this information and their subsequent results can vary markedly. This paper describes the methods for two virtual World Cafés held to gather data on consumer and carer priorities for mental health research. Several methodological processes and challenges arose during data collection, including the achieved recruitment for each group (n = 4, n = 7) falling significantly short of the target number of 20 participants per group. This led to departures from planned methods (i.e., the use of a single ‘room’, rather than multiple breakout rooms). Despite this, the participants in the virtual World Cafés were able to generate over 200 ideas for research priorities, but not identify agreed-upon priorities. Virtual World Cafés can quickly generate a significant volume of data; however, they may not be as effective at generating consensus.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Banfield, M., Gulliver, A., & Morse, A. R. (2022). Virtual world café method for identifying mental health research priorities: Methodological case study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010291

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free