The usefulness of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery concepts for colorectal resections: an economic analysis under DRG conditions

5Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: ERAS® (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) describes a multimodal, interdisciplinary, and interprofessional treatment concept that optimizes the postoperative convalescence of the patient through the use of evidence-based measures. Goal of the work. The aim of this article is to examine the economic feasibility of the ERAS® concept in the German DRG (diagnosis-related groups) system. Material and methods: Since August 2019, patients have been treated in our clinic according to the later certified ERAS® concept. The last 50 patients before ERAS® implementation are compared below with 50 patients after ERAS® implementation, who were identified using a matched pair analysis. In addition to the comparison of costs and revenues, the clinical outcome of the patients is also presented. Results: The cases of the patients in the pre-ERAS® cohort caused median costs of € 7432.83. BWR (valuation ratio) of 3.38 were billable. The resulting DRG revenue for the patients in this group amounted to € 11,325.78. The proceeds generated in the end amounted to € 4575.14. The cases of patients in the ERAS® cohort resulted in costs of € 5582.96. BWR of 2.84 could be billed. The DRG proceeds for the patients in this group therefore amounted to € 10,014.18. The profit generated was thus € 4993.84. Conclusion: The cost reduction generated by ERAS® was more pronounced than the “loss” due to the decrease in BWR. ERAS® is therefore also possible in the German DRG system at absolutely cost-covering levels.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koch, F., Green, M., Dietrich, M., Moikow, L., Schmidt, M., Ristig, M., … Ritz, J. P. (2022). The usefulness of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery concepts for colorectal resections: an economic analysis under DRG conditions. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery, 407(7), 2981–2986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02617-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free