The state between minority and majority nationalism: Decentralization, symbolic recognition, and secessionist crises in Spain and Canada

34Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article addresses the debate about the relative utility of accommodative federalism as a method of conflict management in multinational states. Comparative scholarship on this issue assumes that territorial reform translates into political stability or instability through policy substance. This article tests that assumption against processes of institutional accommodation of Catalan and Quebecois demands for autonomy and recognition.The comparison demonstrates the absence of a linear relationship between institutional change and political instability. When autonomy for minority regions is extended without symbolic recognition, subsequent majority response unfolds in the policy arena, mostly through attempts to symmetrize autonomy arrangements (self-amplifying sequence). However, when the extension of territorial autonomy is combined with formal symbolic recognition, it paves the way for majority political backlash (reactive sequence). Open political opposition by a segment of majority political community, in turn, stimulates secessionist sentiment among members of minority community.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Basta, K. (2018, January 1). The state between minority and majority nationalism: Decentralization, symbolic recognition, and secessionist crises in Spain and Canada. Publius. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjx048

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free