Psychiatry and medicine in the US: Interpreting trends in medical specialty choice

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Abstract An integrated model of change in knowledge, highlighting the role of technologic and organisational paradigms and the activities of professional and extra‐professional groups, is used to clarify the historical development of psychiatry and to account for current specialty choice trends. American psychiatry and medicine stem from disparate scientific/philosophical roots. A review of events leading to the establishment of psychiatry as a medical specialty indicates that the merger of psychiatry and neurology may have stemmed as much from professional competition as from technological or paradigmatic convergence. Recent perceived declines in the choice of psychiatry as a medical specialty are examined in light of this sociology of knowledge perspective. Declining choice of psychiatry as a specialty reflects both underlying paradigmatic conflicts with medicine as well as declining federal support for psychiatric training. Solutions proposed for the perceived problem within psychiatry are designed to solidify ties with medicine, increase political power and prestige, and retain federal support. Copyright © 1987, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Neff, J. A., McFall, S. L., & Cleaveland, T. D. (1987). Psychiatry and medicine in the US: Interpreting trends in medical specialty choice. Sociology of Health & Illness, 9(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11343606

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free