EVALUATION OF VITAMIN D LEVELS IN ADOLESCENTS AND CHILDREN ACCORDING TO AGE, SEX AND SEASONAL CHARACTERISTICS

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of our study was to determine whether vitamin D deficiency was present in adolescents and children who admitted to our hospital; to determine whether there is a difference between 25-hydroxy (25-OH D) vitamin D levels according to age, sex and seasons Materials and Methods: Between the years 2018-2019, 4.153 adolescents and children who admitted to our Pediatric Outpatient Clinic between winter and summer months. 25-0H D vitamin D levels were determined according to age, sex, and seasons. Serum 25-OH D level<20 ng/ml was accepted as severe insufficiency, 20-30 ng/ml insufficiency, >100 ng/ml toxicity. The data were evaluated by the SPSS 22.0 program. One- way variance analysis test and student t-test were used in the evaluation of the data. p<0.05 was considered significant. Results: 55.23% of the population in our study was female. The 25-OH D level in girls was 17.29 ± 11.50 ng/ml. In males, it was found to be 19.16 ± 10.68. The mean 25-OH D level was found 18.13 ± 11.18 ng / mL. In our study, the frequency of vitamin D deficiency was found to be 44.80%. While the frequency of vitamin D deficiency was 57.11% in winter, it was found to be 42.89% in summer. Vitamin D levels show statistically significant differences according to gender, age-range, and season of hospital admittance. Vitamin D levels are lower in adolescent age groups than in child age groups. Conclusion: In our study, severe vitamin D deficiency was found in adolescents and children. Vitamin D levels in children and adolescents varied depending on sex, age, and season.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Türe, E., Müderrisoğlu, S., Acı, R., Çubukçu, M., & Erdem, M. A. (2020). EVALUATION OF VITAMIN D LEVELS IN ADOLESCENTS AND CHILDREN ACCORDING TO AGE, SEX AND SEASONAL CHARACTERISTICS. Ankara Medical Journal, 20(2), 380–386. https://doi.org/10.5505/amj.2020.70893

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free